Karburátor Bing Simson S61 , 60 - 70 ccm + INFO

Karburátor Bing Simson S61 , 60 - 70 ccm + INFO

Karburátor Bing Simson S61 , 60 - 70 ccm + INFO

Kód zboží
1062
ca. 3-5 dny ca. 3-5 dny (odesíláme většinou 2 x týdně v út a čt)
Skladem ks:
5 ks
3106,00 CZK

z toho 21% DPH Doprava Cena dopravy

PayPal ECS

Hodnocení ostatních zákazníkù:

  • 22.12.2012
    to you on another blog, in 1993 I wrote an aclrite, “How Should Disciples View Israel?” and it shows that I do not spiritualize physical Israel out of Romans 11.Below are some snippets from my comments to others in response to “Kiss the Son, Not Israel.” I think you would agree with much of what I say, and you may have a different take in a few areas, and that is fine! Are you in basic agreement with the essence of what I’m advocating?**Whatever “all Israel will be saved” means, we can know this much for sure — when they are “saved” they become part of the body of Christ. Their salvation is not separate from Christ’s bride, as if their redemption takes place within the scope of a second “earthly” plan that God allegedly has for Israel. I have come to take “all Israel will be saved” distributively, meaning that throughout the gospel age redemption in Christ will come to a remnant of Jewish people. Paul used himself as an example of this remnant according to the election of grace. In the end, the Lord will have a people from all over the earth, a number which nobody can count — which was promised to Abraham — descendants like the stars in the sky and the sand on the shores.**As I made clear in a past reply to this post, I have no problem with the Lord dealing with Israel, but the shape that may take will be (1) salvation in Christ, which is the same for Gentiles and (2) it will bring believing Jews into the body of Christ with the nations. In other words, their future in the gospel age has always been part of the one purpose of God in Jesus Christ, not the outworking of an alleged separate “earthly purpose” for Israel.**The point I see, Javier, is that Jesus is the person by which all will be judged, not a country like Israel (Acts 17:31). For people to connect a calamity that comes upon a nation with how they treat Israel is arbitrary and arrogant. You noted the arbitrariness with reference to Argentina. I noted it with reference to Japan in my post. It is arrogant on our parts to claim to know “why” the working of providence unfolds as it does among the nations. The truth is, we don’t have a clue why calamities happen — except that we know everything — every bird that falls to the ground — is an outworking of the Lord’s purposes in Jesus Christ his Son.**Heather, thanks for your good points to consider! In Matthew the Exodus theme is cited with reference to an event in Jesus’ life — “out of Egypt have I called my Son.” Since earthly Israel, then, is ultimately pointing to Jesus, it seems very appropriate to see “Kiss the Son” in Psalm 2 as a reference to Jesus. As I have noted before, whatever the Lord does with what calls itself “Israel” will be salvation into the body of Christ, not an alleged destiny in a separate earthly purpose. Paul expressly stated his concern for them: “My heart’s desire is that they be saved” through Christ.**[In response to John 4:19-24] Well, this is a pivotal passage in many ways, and it is interesting how the Lord carried on this deep conversation with a woman — a Samaritan woman! Certainly one central feature of this section is the reality that under the New Covenant the whole religious emphasis on “proper places” for worship is finished! Think about it. Just about every religion on the earth directs its adherents to a certain “special” place to be with God and go through various rituals. The Samaritans had their special mountain and the Jews had Jerusalem. Jesus tells the woman that all of this is over. It is finished. In Jesus’ “new humanity,” and “new creation” we seek the Father in Spirit and Truth, with no need for designated, prescribed physical places. Of course, the saints gather as “an ekklesia” (1 Cor 11:18). Believers occupy space — but such coming together is fluid, not rooted in fixed religious buildings and the like. In light of John 4:19-24 I think it is a distraction for people to make a big issue of how we are somehow obliged to pray “for the peace of Jerusalem,” as a piece of geography. Jesus indicated to the woman that in His economy such emphasis on the “right” place is a thing of the past. We are part of the “Jerusalem above” (Gal 4:25-26).Sean, it does not appear that national Israel was the conduit for blessing to the nations. Rather, the blessing of Abraham to all nations came through his “seed,” who is Christ. Whereas Israel utterly failed to be a blessing to the nations, Jesus fulfilled Israel’s history as an obedient Son, and thereby secured the Abrahamic blessing – “in you all the nations will be blessed.” out of Romans 11.Below are some snippets from my comments to others in response to “Kiss the Son, Not Israel.” I think you would agree with much of what I say, and you may have a different take in a few areas, and that is fine! Are you in basic agreement with the essence of what I’m advocating?**Whatever “all Israel will be saved” means, we can know this much for sure — when they are “saved” they become part of the body of Christ. Their salvation is not separate from Christ’s bride, as if their redemption takes place within the scope of a second “earthly” plan that God allegedly has for Israel. I have come to take “all Israel will be saved” distributively, meaning that throughout the gospel age redemption in Christ will come to a remnant of Jewish people. Paul used himself as an example of this remnant according to the election of grace. In the end, the Lord will have a people from all over the earth, a number which nobody can count — which was promised to Abraham — descendants like the stars in the sky and the sand on the shores.**As I made clear in a past reply to this post, I have no problem with the Lord dealing with Israel, but the shape that may take will be (1) salvation in Christ, which is the same for Gentiles and (2) it will bring believing Jews into the body of Christ with the nations. In other words, their future in the gospel age has always been part of the one purpose of God in Jesus Christ, not the outworking of an alleged separate “earthly purpose” for Israel.**The point I see, Javier, is that Jesus is the person by which all will be judged, not a country like Israel (Acts 17:31). For people to connect a calamity that comes upon a nation with how they treat Israel is arbitrary and arrogant. You noted the arbitrariness with reference to Argentina. I noted it with reference to Japan in my post. It is arrogant on our parts to claim to know “why” the working of providence unfolds as it does among the nations. The truth is, we don’t have a clue why calamities happen — except that we know everything — every bird that falls to the ground — is an outworking of the Lord’s purposes in Jesus Christ his Son.**Heather, thanks for your good points to consider! In Matthew the Exodus theme is cited with reference to an event in Jesus’ life — “out of Egypt have I called my Son.” Since earthly Israel, then, is ultimately pointing to Jesus, it seems very appropriate to see “Kiss the Son” in Psalm 2 as a reference to Jesus. As I have noted before, whatever the Lord does with what calls itself “Israel” will be salvation into the body of Christ, not an alleged destiny in a separate earthly purpose. Paul expressly stated his concern for them: “My heart’s desire is that they be saved” through Christ.**[In response to John 4:19-24] Well, this is a pivotal passage in many ways, and it is interesting how the Lord carried on this deep conversation with a woman — a Samaritan woman! Certainly one central feature of this section is the reality that under the New Covenant the whole religious emphasis on “proper places” for worship is finished! Think about it. Just about every religion on the earth directs its adherents to a certain “special” place to be with God and go through various rituals. The Samaritans had their special mountain and the Jews had Jerusalem. Jesus tells the woman that all of this is over. It is finished. In Jesus’ “new humanity,” and “new creation” we seek the Father in Spirit and Truth, with no need for designated, prescribed physical places. Of course, the saints gather as “an ekklesia” (1 Cor 11:18). Believers occupy space — but such coming together is fluid, not rooted in fixed religious buildings and the like. In light of John 4:19-24 I think it is a distraction for people to make a big issue of how we are somehow obliged to pray “for the peace of Jerusalem,” as a piece of geography. Jesus indicated to the woman that in His economy such emphasis on the “right” place is a thing of the past. We are part of the “Jerusalem above” (Gal 4:25-26).Sean, it does not appear that national Israel was the conduit for blessing to the nations. Rather, the blessing of Abraham to all nations came through his “seed,” who is Christ. Whereas Israel utterly failed to be a blessing to the nations, Jesus fulfilled Israel’s history as an obedient Son, and thereby secured the Abrahamic blessing – “in you all the nations will be blessed.”
    K recenzi
  • 14.02.2011
    Zdar draci nevite nekdo estly tenhle karburator muzu soupnout do simsona s51 kdyz ho mam predelanyho na 60ccm?